
Sunday, July 11, 2010
"Sweet Taste of Defeat" - Pizza Hut Commercial Celebrates Losing

Saturday, July 10, 2010
More Evidence Hillary's Going to Challenge Obama in 2012

Racist Radical Fringe Becomes Mainstream (or How Hillary Ruined Obama's Summer Vacation)

55 Percent of Likely Voters Find ‘Socialist’ an Accurate Label of Obama?
The latest poll by Democracy Corps, the firm of James Carville and Stan Greenberg, has Republicans leading on the generic ballot among likely voters, 48 percent to 42 percent.
Deep in the poll, they ask, “Now, I am going to read you a list of words and phrases which people use to describe political figures. For each word or phrase, please tell me whether it describes Barack Obama very well, well, not too well, or not well at all.”
On “too liberal,” 35 percent of likely voters say it describes Obama “very well,” 21 percent say “well,” 21 percent say “not too well,” and 17 percentsay “not well at all.” In other words, 56 percent of likely voters consider Obama too liberal.
When asked about “a socialist,” 33 percent of likely voters say it describes Obama “very well,” 22 percent say “well,” 15 percent say “not too well,” and 25 percent say “not well at all.”
In other words, 55 percent of likely voters think “socialist” is a reasonably accurate way of describing Obama.

Thursday, July 8, 2010
Limbaugh (The OTHER One) Points Out Obama's Outrageous Mismanagement
States Fight Back Against Federal Tyranny and Abuse
Amidst the Obama administration's crusade to consolidate power in Washington at the expense of the very sovereignty of the states and our liberties, we should be encouraged that states are fighting back.
Consider just three very recent examples.
Have you heard about the administration's propaganda campaign to adorn each federal "stimulus"project with taxpayer-funded signs to remind us that these projects have been bestowed on us by the beneficence of the Obama administration? The signs read, "Project funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act."
In the first place, they're not funded by any act, but by the American taxpayer. This type of government self-promotion is eerily reminiscent of dictatorial governments in modern history that not only deprived their citizens of freedom and private property but also demanded to be glorified for the morsels they doled back out to them.
Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., isn't taking this outrage sitting down. He has put forth a proposal to prohibit funding for the $20 million that has been spent nationwide (and more than $650,000 in Illinois alone) on these useless signs, which haven't created “one single job†and which serve no purpose beyond touting the administration's supposed benevolence.
Schock assures us that this propaganda campaign is being directed by the administration, not some bureaucrat, as evidenced by documents the administration sends along with the construction projects that dictate how big the logos have to be and reminding those involved that they demonstrate President Obama's commitment to spending taxpayer dollars wisely. Schock quips, "It is almost an oxymoron that we are spending money on these logos and these signs to (show) how wisely we are spending taxpayer money."
If that isn't bad enough, get this: It extends way beyond road projects. The logos are also being required, for example, on police and fire vehicles acquired by cities in part with stimulus funds.
States are also fighting back through their state officials. Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce is incensed over the Obama administration's outrageous and bogus lawsuit against the state of Arizona over its perfectly legitimate effort to protect its border and citizens.
Pearce does not mince words, saying this lawsuit is a matter of the Obama administration's abusing its power to advance its "nonenforcement mentality and agenda. "It's outrageous, what (the administration is) doing. This is about an agenda. This is a president that is acting like a dictator. This is a president who is ignoring the rule of law and siding with lawbreakers over the citizens of this country and the citizens of this state while damage is being conducted every single day. Every single day!"
Just so. Obama is using the power of the federal government (and playing the race card in the process) to file a spurious lawsuit to prevent the sovereign state of Arizona from defending its border and citizens in deference to Obama's reckless immigration reform designs. Come to think of it, Obama wouldn't let Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal take steps to protect his citizens, either, would he? Is there a pattern here? Surely not.
Also, my lifelong friend Missouri Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder announced his filing of a lawsuit Wednesday to block Obamacare. Kinder explains that his lawsuit differs from lawsuits by other states (which he wholeheartedly supports) against Obamacare in that it involves an action not on behalf of the state of Missouri, but of individual plaintiffs who will be injured as a result of the federal law. There are three different plaintiffs, each alleging a different type of injury that will result from the application of Obamacare.
These separate challenges showcase the discriminatory, arbitrary and capricious nature of this horrendous law. One plaintiff alleges, in part, that she will be denied equal protection of the law, as she, along with citizens in 49 states, will lose access to Medicare Advantage, while certain Florida citizens will continue to enjoy it -- for the sole reason that Obama needed Florida votes to get the bill passed. Another plaintiff -- though a young, healthy woman who doesn't smoke or drink -- will be required to purchase the one-size-fits-all Obama plan against her will instead of simply procuring far less expensive catastrophic coverage.
In his fiery announcement about the lawsuit, Kinder declared that this legal challenge is about protecting the constitutional rights of Missourians against the illegal encroachments of the federal government. And in response to federal politicians who demand that we trust them to protect our interests, Kinder movingly invoked Thomas Jefferson, who said, In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. Amen!
God bless the states and our state officials for opposing this tyranny.
Posted by David Limbaugh at July 8, 2010 02:48 PM

Obama: Recovery Relies on Doing the Same Things Over and Over While Expecting a Different Result
MORE FROM BUSINESSWEEK
By Nicholas Johnston
July 8 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama said a $32 million government grant to a maker of battery-driven trucks is an example of how government funding can help businesses generate jobs as the nation recovers from a “brutal recession.”
I'm wondering what $32 Million worth of trucks no one has expressed a desire for can do for the economy
“Government doesn’t have all the answers,” Obama said today after touring the Smith Electric Vehicles factory in Kansas City, Missouri. “But what government can do is lay the foundation for small businesses to expand and thrive.”
Government doesn't have ANY of the answers. Tax breaks would help profitable companies retain earnings and hire workers for lasting jobs that the market will support. But why bother when you can just distribute tax dollars at will to keep up the illusion of growth?
Obama is on a two-day trip to Missouri and Nevada to stump for his economic policies and raise money for Democratic Senate candidates. Tomorrow he’ll also give a speech on the economy in Las Vegas.
After all the Vegas-bashing that Obama did last year, maybe he's bringing a bag of money with him?
The economy, jobs and the deficit are likely to be top issues in the November elections that will decide control of Congress. Obama today defended the $862 billion economic stimulus measure Congress passed soon after he took office, which Republicans have criticized as wasteful. And as he has stepped up his defense of his own policies, he has increased his attacks on Republicans.
$862 Billion dollars... dare I say that precious little of this huge transfer of wealth saw its way into the pockets of workers?
‘Naysayers’
“There are some people who argue that we should abandon our efforts,” Obama said. “The naysayers, they ought to travel across America and meet the people I’ve met” at factories that are hiring, he said.
The people he's met have make-work jobs and jobs producing items the market has no need or desire for... maybe he should meet some people who aren't making subsidized products that the administration sees as politically advantageous to support?
The U.S. economy is struggling to recover from the worst recession since the 1930s, with 83,000 private jobs added in June and unemployment at 9.5 percent.
Closer to 20% if you count all the people who've just stopped looking for work...
“This has been a difficult period for America: two years of brutal recession; a decade of economic insecurity,” Obama said. “And there are going to be some hard days ahead.”
Translation: "I'm doing all I can to destroy free enterprise in the market, so don't expect anything to get better any time soon."
He said he expects energy investments alone to generate 700,000 jobs over the next few years nationwide. “And these are investments that will not only boost our economy in the short term, this is going to lay a platform for the future.”
Since when is a government grant an "investment"? If these were such good investments, why won't any of the banks, still flush with $800+ Billion of taxpayer money, take any risk on these ventures? Why on earth do we need government to do what the free market has done so well for so long - create jobs? Oh yeah... because private industry is under attack.
The administration has highlighted government’s investment at Smith Electric, which was matched by $36 million of the company’s money, as an example of how the government can help the private sector create jobs.
The Smith Electric factory will eventually employ about 70 people and build about 500 battery-powered commercial trucks per year, Matt Rogers, an adviser to Energy Secretary Steven Chu, told reporters yesterday.
Let's see... $32 Million and $36 Million is $68 Million invested to create 70 jobs.... sounds like it's almost $1 million per job. Could be a while before we see any return on that. But they're making 500 trucks a year. Hmm... at $50,000 per truck, that would come out to $25 Million a year. Assuming that the manufacturer has about a 20% gross margin (pretty healthy), that would mean they'll make back their money in about 14 years. That's assuming you know anyone who wants to buy a battery-powered truck. Even with a proven product, that's an awful long investment horizon.
Purchase Capital
“The intent of the funding here is to enable Smith to purchase the capital equipment necessary to get this manufacturing assembly line operational,” he said.
The company plans to build as many as 20 factories around the country.
“This is a microcosm of precisely what needs to keep happening,” said Jared Bernstein, Vice President Joe Biden’s top economic adviser.
Historically, financing capital improvements and purchase capital has been the job of banks. Now that government is taking the risk, we can expect manufacturers to build all kinds of stupid crap for which there is no viable market... because the government has minimized the risk. Risk tends to force manufacturers to make useful products that they can later sell. Glad we're done with that stupid model.
Translation: "If we keep this up we'll bankrupt the country with plenty of time to spare for the 2012 election. "
Later today in Kansas City, Obama will attend fundraisers for Missouri Democratic Senate candidate Robin Carnahan in Kansas City.
Tonight he’ll raise money in Las Vegas for Harry Reid of Nevada, the top Democrat in the Senate.
--With assistance from Julianna Goldman in Washington. Editors: Robin Meszoly, Don Frederick
To contact the reporters on this story: Nicholas Johnston in Kansas City, Missouri, at njohnston3@bloomberg.net;
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva@bloomberg.net

Obama's Talking Up a Depression
Last week was “Job’s Week” for the Obama Administration, with speeches and road trips designed to highlight ‘Recovery Summer’ and how the economy is improving. Then they got blindsided by some awful jobs numbers. So this week, “Export Week”, the White House made sure they inflated their ‘expected’ unemployment claims so the results would fall below and look positive. But there are still many indicators that not only are we already in a double-dip recession, trends are all pointing to a potential depression.
First, let us look at exports, since Obama is talking up how U.S. exports have risen 17%. During the same period, U.S. imports have risen 20%. So we’re still losing ground. I’m not sure if I would be running around the country bragging about how we’ll be exporting more pork to China and chicken to Russia. Not exactly the same as exporting automobiles and TV sets.
While this week’s unemployment claims were ‘below expectations’, the reality is that we still lost some 454,000 jobs last week. Maybe some 25,000 to 50,000 hiring took place, mostly summer temporary jobs in the hotel and resort industries. The critical number to be watching is the overall employment number, which has declined in the past year from 59.4% of the U.S. population down to 58.5%. No recovery there yet!
The Dow Jones Index has been a bit of a roller coaster lately. While it has improved significantly over the past year, since January, it has lost ground, around 5%. Mind you, the DJI only represents 30 of the largest publicly traded corporations. More frightening is the Russell 2000 Index, which represents 2000 smaller corporations worth an average of about $500 Million each. The Russell 2000 Index, which is often used by mutual fund managers, has declined nearly 20% since January!
As you can guess, this is a really bad number! The Russell 2000 Index did get a bounce in the 4th Quarter of 2009, but was still off 26% since it’s record high in July 2007. That is what is known as a “dead cat bounce” on Wall Street. The implications here is that there is still a great deal of uncertainty and reluctance in small to mid-sized companies, as also indicated by last week’s ADP Payroll report. Small businesses, with 50 or less employees, went negative and mid-size companies, with 51 to 500 employees only hired 3,000 new workers nationwide.
A story out of Canada last week caused a bit of a flurry when the Financial Times leaked remarks made by GE’s CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, during a private dinner in Rome, Italy. Immelt was complaining about how China is cleaning our clocks and that the Obama Administration is anti-business. This week, we’ve seen Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on an apology tour trying to convince business leaders that the Obama Administration is business-friendly.
While Obama and his cronies try to talk up the economy, there is still no clear evidence of a recovery. All the indicators point to the “dead cat bounce” ending and the bears returning to the market. We’ve already entered a double-dip recession. The next event will be a short-term deflationary move on the U.S. dollar. The grim side points to a depression (some say we’re already there) followed by massive hyper-inflation as America prints it’s way out of debt.
